Religious food rules

In Switzerland, the federal council just decreed that insects are not a food group, and thus can’t be sold as food. As insects are an established food source for millions of people, this decision has probably more to do with personal preferences than anything else. Or was it perhaps religion? Possible, but unlikely in Switzerland.

Yet, some religions do have dietary laws. For example, neither Jews nor Muslims must eat Pork. Arguably, some of these rules made sense at the time and context they were passed. For example, the Jewish rule to forbid lobster or shrimp can be read as a cautionary tale: meat from these animals spoils quickly, and not eating it can prevent some severe illness. Most Jews and Moslems at the time lived in hot countries, where the temperature significantly shortens the time until food goes bad. Also, high temperature favors infections, so adhering to the dietary laws increased your chance to survive; at the time they were good rules.

Today, these laws are completely irrelevant: we know about infections, and refrigeration technology allows us to keep meat fresh for a long time irrespective of the weather and temperature outside. Whoever still adheres to kosher or halal diets does so either in ignorance of their origins, or out of tradition.

Or, of course, for religious reasons: because your God said so. In this case, though, you’ll also have to contend with the fact that the god who gave you these rules did so simply because he was too cheap or ignorant to spring for the refrigeration- and hygiene know-how. So which isn’t he: ‘all-knowing’ or ‘loving’?

Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition…

Fundamental believers seem to love to take it upon themselves to ‘defend the honor’ of their gods. Unfortunately, some use violence, while others use peaceful means of protest. None use intelligence, though, as an omnipotent being doesn’t need defending.

In the peaceful protest category we have Rev Brian McClung’s (whom I’ve already commented on the last couple of days). His tragicomic tilting at windmills reminds me of a similar quixotic case of protest against Monty Python’s Life of Brian. Initially, it was banned in Ireland (where McClung lives) and Norway – for Blasphemy. Monty Python responded by changing the tagline to ‘so funny that it was banned in Norway’

Fundamental Christians picketed the movie theaters to protest. As a response, interest in the movie spiked, making the movie an international commercial success.

Look how silly you look today if you were one of the protesters then.

Not to mention the fact that ‘Always look at the bright side if life’, the movie’s closing theme, was performed live to a worldwide audience at the closing ceremony of the 2012 Olympic Games in London.

Yeah, that silly.

Rev McClung’s speech (abridged)

Yesterday I commented on Rev Brian McClung’s protest against Reduced Shakespeare Company’s play The Bible: The Complete Word of God (abridged). The kerfuffle caused by the protest – not to mention the city council’s ill-advised attempt to ban the play – caused the performances to be sold out during their first days. Or, as the good reverend sees it:

Rev McClung described it as “perverse human nature” that the play had sold so many tickets since opposition was raised.

And so McClung took a stand, made his voice heard, electrified the crowd with his righteous defense of the honor of God’s word, and made sure that –

Police maintained a small presence but left before the play began.

Ouch.